Canadian Journal of Biomedical Research & Technology has set the accompanying rule to streamline the way toward assessing and to guarantee quality substance is distributed on this journal. The companion review process is done in total caution where the reviewer and the creators' personalities are kept covered up in order to not make any extension for separation and partiality of any sort.
- The companion review process is basic to publishing. We trust that the trustworthiness of the peer review framework is the thing that maintains the nature of the substance created on the journal.
- Peer review criteria for composition assessment
- Peer reviewers are relied upon to pursue these rules to guarantee amazing writing is created and manuscripts are improved.
- Reviewers must comprehend and process the measures set for distributing by the journal so as to more readily review articles and check whether they hold up to said gauges.
- With each distributed article, the desire for the journal for better nature of substance goes up. Consistently enhancing substance is normal for distributing.
- There ought to be present and future importance of the theme submitted for review.
- Reviewer’s roles and responsibilities during the peer review process Put down your perspectives with respect to the quality and the introduction of the substance and gave recommends to enhancement of segments you feel can be redesigned.
- Framework the quality and the shortcomings of each original manuscript.
- Propose regions of enhancement, let the writer realize what can change or upgrade to enhance the nature of the article.
- n the off chance that you esteem an original copy disgraceful of distributing, clarify the purposes behind dismissal and how you touched base to the said end.
- Analysts are relied upon to keep up the secrecy of the writing they get for review, all through the review process, until publication.